
Leicestershire: Grace Dieu (above)
and nearby Coleorton (St Mary's Church below)I have had cause on two recent occasions to consider the nature of
ekphrastic work, so I thought it might be a useful moment to formulate some (personal) thoughts and air a couple of queries on the subject.
From my undergraduate studies of Classical Greek, I know that
ek corresponds to
out, and
phrasis to
speak. We find
ek or
ec in English words like
ectoplasm. We also find it transmuted to
ex in words like
external. We know
phrasis, of course, from words like
phrase and
phraseology.
Ekphrasis, a rhetorical technique, is therefore a combination of these word-parts, which when combined give a meaning of speaking out or proclamation - or to put it another way, of calling 'an inanimate object by name' [
Wikipedia - see also a number of definitions garnered by
Ryan Welsh at the University of Chicago].
The majority of
ekphrastic poems (I believe) shed light on a picture without the two art forms being physically conjoined. They do, however, build an imaginary bridge between the 'verbal' and the 'visual'. Take, for instance, the iconic example of Keats'
Ode on a Grecian Urn. What is important here is that the poet brings a 'notional' or 'allusive' - rather than an 'actual' - image before our inner eye and makes us question what we visualise. There is no need for us to see the urn (which may or may not be a single artefact) portrayed in a given medium alongside the poem. The words alone do the work, conjuring up the object in our imagination.
We occasionally encounter
ekphrasis in poetry as an actual and symbiotic pairing of word and image. That is to say, for example, that a poem text and piece of corresponding 'visual art' work in tandem to form a fusion or new creation. The one art form elucidates and illuminates the other in some manner - and this is a two-way process. We can all recall our childhood story and poetry books in which the bold and colourful illustrations added so much to each tale or poem. I consider this powerful marriage to be
ekphrasis at its most basic (and on occasions at its most potent) level.
In these multi-media days of collaborative enterprises and opportunities, we are familiar with countless instances of art forms impacting on other media. Ekphrastic poetry could be 'illuminated' or 'enhanced' (I hesitate to say 'illustrated') by 'actual' painted work, pen-and-ink drawings or photographs. It may be of interest to note that a union of photography and poetry has appeared in the
Poetry Book Society bulletin as
Photoetry, but I see this as a form of
ekphrasis rather than as something different again.
The questions lingering in my mind are ones of definition and distinction:
- Are all 'visual' poems ekphrastic?
- Are all 'illustrated' stories (like those in the children's picture books mentioned above) ekphrastic?
And in each case, if not, then why not?
* * *
Previous Coastcard posts touching on
Ekphrasis can be found
here and
here. My
Photoetry entry (with a couple of book recommendations) is
here.
You may also like the following: